Bridgestone Ecopia Logo
Fueling the way forward. tire

Behold Ecopia™ – Bridgestone’s flagship line of eco-friendly truck tires. These ultra-fuel-efficient tires not only drive costs down, but pave the way for a brighter future. With advanced tire technologies specifically designed to reduce rolling resistance, Ecopia is ideal for fleets who demand fuel efficiency and performance with the added benefits of CARB compliance and EPA SmartWay® verification. It’s a win-win for you. And the planet.

long life    fuel efficient    lower total life cost
Product Comparison Chart

Low rolling resistance

It's a major contributor to minimizing fuel consumption while lowering CO2 emissions. Using advanced tire technologies, Ecopia tires offer reduced rolling resistance compared to leading brands 1 while delivering excellent mileage, irregular-wear resistance and casing durability. It all adds up to a lower impact on our planet.

greater fuel efficiency

4% Thanks to low rolling resistance technologies
Ecopia truck tires can deliver your fleet up to in fuel savings3.
pressure gauge

maintain your investment

As with any Bridgestone tire, it is important that Ecopia truck tires are maintained at proper air pressure to realize long-lasting treadwear and fuel efficiency. In fact, according to the Technology & Maintenance Council of the American Trucking Associations, a tire that is underinflated by 20% will last only 70% of its potential service life. Regular checks are necessary to keep performance levels and mileage at optimum levels.

Life Cycle Cost Calculator
Lower costs. Greener returns. Based on rolling resistance and field mileage tests, Bridgestone Ecopia and Bandag FuelTech are our most fuel-efficient and lowest total cost of ownership tire and retread solution. Combining proprietary low rolling resistance technology with the industry's most retreadable casing, Ecopia and FuelTech can help reduce fuel use and extend tire life for lower costs and greener returns, when compared to other Bridgestone tires.
Based on rolling resistance and field mileage tests, Bridgestone Ecopia and Bandag FuelTech are our most fuel-efficient and lowest total cost of ownership tire and retread solution. Combining proprietary low rolling resistance technology with the industry’s most retreadable casing, Ecopia and FuelTech can help reduce fuel use and extend tire life for lower costs and greener returns, when compared to other Bridgestone tires.
The Bridgestone R283 Ecopia, M710 Ecopia, and R197 Ecopia, in size 295/75R22.5, were compared to the equivalent size of Goodyear G399 LHS FM, G305 AT LHD FM, and G316 LHT FM and the equivalent size of Michelin XZA3+, XDA Energy, and XTA Energy. Results obtained from third party laboratory SAE J1269 rolling resistance test.
BASys data from over two million Bridgestone, Goodyear and Michelin brand casings recorded between June 2009 and November 2010 prove that Bridgestone had the lowest percentage of tires that could not be retreaded due to conditions relating to casing construction.
Based on EPA SmartWay rolling resistance to fuel savings ratio. Actual results may vary.
5%, 9% and 10% above is the weighted average of the first two lines of data.
* Lower costs. Greener returns. Based on rolling resistance and field mileage tests, Bridgestone Ecopia and Bandag FuelTech are our most fuel-efficient and lowest total cost of ownership tire and retread solution. Combining proprietary low rolling resistance technology with the industry's most retreadable casing, Ecopia and FuelTech can help reduce fuel use and extend tire life for lower costs and greener returns, when compared to other Bridgestone tires.
^ Based on rolling resistance and field mileage tests, Bridgestone Ecopia and Bandag FuelTech are our most fuel-efficient and lowest total cost of ownership tire and retread solution. Combining proprietary low rolling resistance technology with the industry’s most retreadable casing, Ecopia and FuelTech can help reduce fuel use and extend tire life for lower costs and greener returns, when compared to other Bridgestone tires.
1 The Bridgestone R283 Ecopia, M710 Ecopia, and R197 Ecopia, in size 295/75R22.5, were compared to the equivalent size of Goodyear G399 LHS FM, G305 AT LHD FM, and G316 LHT FM and the equivalent size of Michelin XZA3+, XDA Energy, and XTA Energy. Results obtained from third party laboratory SAE J1269 rolling resistance test.
2 BASys data from over two million Bridgestone, Goodyear and Michelin brand casings recorded between June 2009 and November 2010 prove that Bridgestone had the lowest percentage of tires that could not be retreaded due to conditions relating to casing construction.
3 Based on EPA SmartWay rolling resistance to fuel savings ratio. Actual results may vary.
4 The Bridgestone R283 Ecopia, M710 Ecopia, and R197 Ecopia, in size 295/75R22.5, are compared to the equivalent size of Goodyear G399 LHS FM, G305 AT LHD FM, and G316 LHT FM and the equivalent size of Michelin XZA3+, XDA Energy, and XTA Energy; and the Bandag B710 FuelTech and B197 FuelTech compared to Goodyear G305 and G314 and Michelin XDA2 23 and XT1 AT. Results are based in part on third party SAE J1269 rolling resistance tests. Actual on road results may vary.
5%, 9% and 10% above is the weighted average of the first two lines of data.