Behold Ecopia™ – Bridgestone’s flagship line of eco-friendly truck tires. These ultra-fuel-efficient tires not only drive costs down, but pave the way for a brighter future. With advanced tire technologies specifically designed to reduce rolling resistance, Ecopia is ideal for fleets who demand fuel efficiency and performance with the added benefits of CARB compliance and EPA SmartWay™ verification. It’s a win-win for you. And the planet.
long life •
fuel efficient •
lower total life cost
Low rolling resistance
It's a major contributor to minimizing fuel consumption while lowering CO2 emissions. Using advanced tire technologies, Ecopia tires offer reduced rolling resistance compared to leading brands 1 while delivering excellent mileage, irregular-wear resistance and casing durability. It all adds up to a lower impact on our planet.
greater fuel efficiency
Thanks to low rolling resistance technologiesEcopia truck tires can deliver your fleet up to in fuel savings3.
maintain your investment
As with any Bridgestone tire, it is important that Ecopia truck tires are maintained at proper air pressure to realize long-lasting treadwear and fuel efficiency. In fact, according to the Technology & Maintenance Council of the American Trucking Associations, a tire that is underinflated by 20% will last only 70% of its potential service life. Regular checks are necessary to keep performance levels and mileage at optimum levels.
©2012 Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Lower costs. Greener returns. Based on rolling resistance and field mileage tests, Bridgestone Ecopia and Bandag FuelTech
are our most fuel-efficient and lowest total cost of ownership
tire and retread solution. Combining proprietary low rolling
resistance technology with the industry's most retreadable
casing, Ecopia and FuelTech can help reduce fuel use and
extend tire life for lower costs and greener returns, when
compared to other Bridgestone tires.
Based on rolling resistance and field mileage tests,
Bridgestone Ecopia and Bandag FuelTech are our most
fuel-efficient and lowest total cost of ownership tire and
retread solution. Combining proprietary low rolling resistance
technology with the industry’s most retreadable casing, Ecopia
and FuelTech can help reduce fuel use and extend tire life for
lower costs and greener returns, when compared to other
Bridgestone tires.
The Bridgestone R283 Ecopia, M710 Ecopia, and R197 Ecopia, in
size 295/75R22.5, were compared to the equivalent size of
Goodyear G399 LHS FM, G305 AT LHD FM, and G316 LHT FM and the
equivalent size of Michelin XZA3+, XDA Energy, and XTA Energy.
Results obtained from third party laboratory SAE J1269 rolling
resistance test.
BASys data from over two million Bridgestone, Goodyear and
Michelin brand casings recorded between June 2009 and November
2010 prove that Bridgestone had the lowest percentage of tires
that could not be retreaded due to conditions relating to
casing construction.
Based on EPA SmartWay rolling resistance to fuel savings ratio. Actual results may vary.
5%, 9% and 10% above is the weighted average of the first two lines of data.
* Lower costs. Greener returns. Based on rolling resistance and field mileage tests, Bridgestone Ecopia and Bandag FuelTech
are our most fuel-efficient and lowest total cost of ownership
tire and retread solution. Combining proprietary low rolling
resistance technology with the industry's most retreadable
casing, Ecopia and FuelTech can help reduce fuel use and
extend tire life for lower costs and greener returns, when
compared to other Bridgestone tires.
^ Based on rolling resistance and field mileage tests,
Bridgestone Ecopia and Bandag FuelTech are our most
fuel-efficient and lowest total cost of ownership tire and
retread solution. Combining proprietary low rolling resistance
technology with the industry’s most retreadable casing, Ecopia
and FuelTech can help reduce fuel use and extend tire life for
lower costs and greener returns, when compared to other
Bridgestone tires.
1 The Bridgestone R283 Ecopia, M710 Ecopia, and R197 Ecopia, in
size 295/75R22.5, were compared to the equivalent size of
Goodyear G399 LHS FM, G305 AT LHD FM, and G316 LHT FM and the
equivalent size of Michelin XZA3+, XDA Energy, and XTA Energy.
Results obtained from third party laboratory SAE J1269 rolling
resistance test.
2 BASys data from over two million Bridgestone, Goodyear and
Michelin brand casings recorded between June 2009 and November
2010 prove that Bridgestone had the lowest percentage of tires
that could not be retreaded due to conditions relating to
casing construction.
3 Based on EPA SmartWay rolling resistance to fuel savings ratio. Actual results may vary.
4 The Bridgestone R283 Ecopia, M710 Ecopia, and R197 Ecopia, in size 295/75R22.5,
are compared to the equivalent size of Goodyear G399 LHS FM, G305 AT LHD FM,
and G316 LHT FM and the equivalent size of Michelin XZA3+, XDA Energy, and XTA
Energy; and the Bandag B710 FuelTech and B197 FuelTech compared to Goodyear
G305 and G314 and Michelin XDA2 23 and XT1 AT. Results are based in part on
third party SAE J1269 rolling resistance tests. Actual on road results may
vary.
†5%, 9% and 10% above is the weighted average of the first two lines of data.